September 2008

The AP is reporting that Democratic governor Bill Ritter plans to announce his opposition to Amendment 46, which would amend the state constitution to ban government preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin. Shocking, yes?

In March, the Secretary of State determined that the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative submitted enough signatures to appear on the November ballot.

We’ll link to Ritter’s statement when it’s available.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Clarence ThomasJust as I long for people to stop using the term “African American” to describe black Americans, most of whom never set foot on the continent, I want people to stop using the term “affirmative action” to describe race preferences.

Dahlia Lithwick, writing for Newsweek, uses the term affirmative action throughout her 865-word article about Justice Clarence Thomas and vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin to describe race preferences, a policy whereby certain ethnic minority groups are given preferential treatment over other groups. She notes that Justice Thomas opposes race preferences, despite “benefiting” from the practice. In his autobiography, My Grandfather’s Son, Thomas wrote about the stigma of race preferences, the same sort of stigma Palin must be facing.

Sarah PalinThomas received preferential treatment based on the color of his skin, as I and many other blacks have received. Was Palin chosen partly because she was a woman? Most likely. It’s reasonable to perceive recipients of preferential treatment as less qualified until proven otherwise. It’s not fair, but the goal is not to change people’s minds about those hired/admitted under preferences. The goal is to eliminate preferences and allow individuals to compete with the entire pool of applicants, so that no one is stigmatized for being assessed based on lowered standards.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A group of people claimed signature gatherers misled citizens into signing the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative (CoCRI), also known as Amendment 46. Some accused the campaign of tricking people into believing they were signing a petition to keep preferences instead of dismantling them. Venita Vinson said a signature gatherer asked her to sign a petition for “affirmative action.” (Source)

Last Friday an administrative law judge, who said the complainants didn’t supply enough details, threw out those claims.

CoCRI director said, “Given the lack of evidence presented by our opposition, the court did the right thing by dismissing all of the complaints. We will continue to fight with vigor any and all false allegations against Amendment 46.”

In March, the Colorado Secretary of State determined that CoCRI submitted enough signatures to appear on the November ballot. Earlier this month, the secretary announced that Initiative 82, which would preserve race and sex preferences in government hiring, contracting, and admissions, will not appear on the November ballot.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

In a 2004 study called A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools (PDF), University of California law professor Richard Sander posited that law school race-based preferences result in fewer black lawyers, because blacks admitted under these conditions are placed in schools that exceed their levels of preparation. As a result, they failed the bar exam at higher rates.

In 2007, Sander asked the State Bar’s Committee of Bar Examiners for historical data on past bar exams, and the committee refused. Sander asked the state’s highest court to compel the committee to release the data. Last week the court denied his request and said he should refile in the appropriate court, citing privacy concerns. (Law.com)

We’ll post a PDF copy of the opinion when it’s available.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Earlier this month, the Colorado Secretary of State announced that Initiative 82, which would preserve race and sex preferences in government hiring, contracting, and admissions, will not appear on the November ballot.

As you may recall, the secretary determined in March that the Colorado Civil Rights Initiative (CoCRI) submitted enough signatures to appear on the November ballot. CoCRI, known as Amendment 46, reads: “The state shall not discriminate against or grant preferential treatment to any group or individual on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public contracting, or public education.”

CoCRI director Jessica Peck Corry said, “We know that signature gathering campaigns are very difficult, but given the fact that this campaign was designed to confuse voters, we’re extremely pleased with the result.”

The Durango Herald Online features a story on race in the upcoming election as it pertains to preferences. People interviewed in the article include those who support Amendment 46. Proponent Kate Melvin said, “We’re saddling women and minorities with the notion that without assistance, they can’t get the job.”

Those who oppose the amendment say it would “end valuable programs” that help women and minorities in college programs like science and engineering. Typically, so-called affirmative action supporters misconstrue the meaning of the term.

There is nothing wrong with reaching out to a wide variety of people for hiring and admissions. That is affirmative action. It is wrong to implement a different standard (read: lower) of evaluation for women and minorities. That is preferential treatment.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Missouri State U Seeks to ‘Promote Ethnic Diversity’

September 22, 2008

Michael Nietzel, president of Missouri State University, released his annual campus report for 2008, and one of his proposals is to “promote ethnic diversity” on campus. (Source) Ethnic diversity is not an unworthy goal, but when efforts to increase diversity involve discriminating against one ethnic group in favor of another (and lowering standards for one [...]

Read the full article →

Blacks and Whites Differ On Race Relations

September 22, 2008

Here’s a newsflash: a new AP-Yahoo News online poll shows that blacks and whites hold different views on race. Whites and blacks generally don’t agree on how much prejudice exists and where the fault lies. It didn’t take a poll to determine that. Blacks and whites will always hold different views on race relations. According [...]

Read the full article →

Signature Blockers, Part 2

September 19, 2008

Signature blockers, also known as petition blockers, thrive on preventing citizens from reading and signing petitions for state ballot initiatives. Tactics range from talking over signature takers to insulting them to following them around, and worse. The Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration, & Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) [...]

Read the full article →

Minority Enrollment Dips

September 18, 2008

On November 7, 2006, 58 percent of Michigan voters chose to bar the state from using preferences in government hiring, contracting, and admissions. Since then, a number of schools in Michigan have reported dips in minority enrollment. University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman claims enrollment at her school has dropped in the wake of [...]

Read the full article →

Forget Diversity and Hit the Books

September 17, 2008

I’ve always thought it was strange that minority students pontificate about the so-called value of admitting more people “of color” into colleges and universities for the sake of diversity, but separate themselves into racial “ghettos” as soon as they get there. Why the separation? Of course, people tend to self-segregate. It’s human nature. But shouldn’t [...]

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Read the full article →