January 2010

Cape VerdeThe University of Massachusetts will set aside 12 slots at its medical school for members of “underrepresented” groups, which include blacks, “Hispanics, certain Southeast Asians, and Cape Verdeans, Brazilians, and other Portuguese speakers.” (Source)

Wow. I guess the school could cram a couple students from each group into those lower-standard slots.

For people who don’t believe preferences and set asides equal lower standards and think I sound like a broken record, consider this: without even looking at grades, scores, and statistics, why do you think schools set aside slots for members of certain races if these students are being admitted under the same standard as everyone else? Students admitted to those 12 slots are not being assessed in the general pool of applicants. The med school has minimum criteria, of course, but the race and ethnicity of these students are given weight that others students don’t get. With the set-aside slots, no matter how small or large, students are being admitted or denied admission based on race.

According to the article, low-income and first-generation college students of any ethnic background could apply under the “Medical Scholars Program.” That makes it sound as if any poor or first-generation college students can apply, if we go by plain language. But everyone on the face of the planet has an “ethnic background.” Do they have in mind ethnic Germans and ethnic Lithuanians?

The Center for Equal Opportunity‘s Roger Clegg blogs at The Corner:

“I won’t make the usual and obvious points about why discrimination on the basis of skin color and national origin is unfair, divisive, and stupid. All that aside, this seems to me to be almost certainly illegal. To be sure, this isn’t exactly like the race/ethnicity set-aside program that was struck down in Bakke, since here the slots are also (in theory at least) going to be open to applications from members of disfavored racial and ethnic groups, so long as they are low-income or the first in their families to attend college. But this is still a very mechanical use of race, like the point system struck down in Gratz v. Bollinger. And the justification given for the racially discriminatory program by UMass president Jack Wilson is the need for ‘role models’ — which has also been rejected by the Supreme Court (in Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, in 1986).”

A commenter writes:

“In one fell swoop, they have DESTROYED the value of the years of hard work and academic merit of any minority candidate who might graduate through the color-blind open competition admissions process (this includes all minorities from any other state or country (or even worse, from this state) who are not among the ‘special’ 12 minorities who are given this unique ‘reverse discrimination’ privilege). Not only have they stripped all value from the degrees of the truly accomplished minority candidates, but the existence of this affirmative-action program will spread like wildfire by word of mouth, and knowledgeable patients will intentionally avoid any contact with ALL minority graduates of UMass Medical School for fear of being treated by one of these affirmative-action ‘doctors’ who may not know what they are doing. The stigma of this program will drive all of these fully-qualified minority graduates out-of-state after they become doctors, where they will hope that few people will know of the existence of this truly disastrous program.”

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Always Lower, Never Higher

by lbarber on 01/26/2010

in Column

FDNY firefighterOne idea that transcends political lines is that blacks are inferior and should be held to lower standards in perpetuity.

In 2007, the Department of Justice (DOJ) under George W. Bush filed suit against the New York City Fire Department (FDNY) for violating the Civil Rights Act. The Vulcan Society, a fraternal organization of black firefighters, joined the lawsuit. Did the department hire and fire based on race? Did it deny promotions based on race? No. The department requires all candidates seeking employment, regardless of race, to take an exam that assesses “reading comprehension, problem solving, spatial recognition and applying rules to general concepts.” For reasons that will be discussed and debated until the end of time, blacks as a group don’t score as well as whites on such tests.

Last summer, a federal judge ruled that FDNY discriminated against blacks and Hispanics with an exam used in 1999 and 2002. Two weeks ago, the same judge ruled that New York City intentionally discriminated against minorities by continuing to use the exam.

Read the rest at Townhall.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

South Philly high studentAnother federal case! Oh my.

Remember December’s spate of stories about mostly black students at South Philadelphia High School (designated “persistently dangerous”) beating up students of Asian descent because they’re of Asian descent? Students and groups complained, and too little was done about it.

Last week, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund filed suit against the school district, alleging “deliberate and discriminatory indifference.” (Source)

The group, citing Fourteenth Amendment violations, claims the district not only failed to protect them, but covered up and downplayed the attacks. Specifically, the group says security guards ignored attacks, and a staffer tried to talk a parent out of calling 911 when her child suffered a broken nose.

Disgusting, if true.

The school district suspended about 10 students, but obviously that wasn’t enough. There were problems before the attack, says the AALDEF, and whatever help officials offered wasn’t effective. Cecilia Chen, an attorney with the AALDEF, said students of Asian descent are still being harassed.

Students of one race attacking students of another based on race is a clear case of a “bias” crime. I think the concept of “hate crime” is dumb, but if we’re going to have such laws on the books, let’s apply them consistently. The local authorities should have bent over backward to resolve the matter and tried everything reasonable possible to avoid a federal lawsuit. For unfathomable reasons, they did not.

Why didn’t the school make a diligent effort to stop the attacks? It’s a loaded question, of course. “Are you still beating your wife?” No doubt the School District of Philadelphia believes it made a diligent effort to stop the attacks. Whether the Department of Justice takes up the case remains to be seen.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Don’t It Make My Brown Eyes Blue?

by lbarber on 01/25/2010

in General

blue eyeIf you’ve had the misfortune of sitting through workplace “diversity training” sessions, you know how eye-rollingly pointless they can be.

The diversity training idea stems from a former teacher named Jane Elliott, who required her all-white class to participate in role-playing exercises. Groups were separated by eye color. The first day, the blues were treated well, and the browns were treated badly. The next day, the treatment was reversed. The point was for whites to be on the receiving end of ill-treatment and empathize with blacks.

Elliott went on to lead diversity sessions at corporations, conducting similar role-playing exercises, commanding a fee of $6,000.

Diversity so-called training in the corporate sphere is one thing. Adults are better equipped to know whether they’re being subjected to misguided guilt and indoctrination. Children, with their easily malleable minds, are less equipped.

I recently read about teachers in government schools conducting segregation experiments on Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday. Apparently, these teachers (or more likely, higher-ups) believe requiring students to treat one another badly based on eye color is an appropriate way to teach them about America’s history of government-mandated racial segregation.

Putting children through emotional pain is a valid teaching method? Do schools typically teach through role-playing? Not only do white children in 2010 bear no responsibility whatsoever for government-mandated racial segregation, black children in 2010 are not recipients of it. What do bureaucrats hope to accomplish by separating students based on differences? Invoking children to anger and frustration generates resentment, not understanding.

The more important lesson about America’s history of racial segregation is that men like King appealed to the better part of people’s nature to carry out the promise of America’s founding and bestow the same rights to blacks that everyone else possessed. Americans of different races sacrificed and risked life and limb so that blacks could gain the privilege of being treated as free and responsible individuals equal before the law. If schools instill this idea into those malleable minds, instead of subjecting them to inane role-playing exercises designed to “teach” them how nasty people can be to each other, children might learn an enduringly valuable and more profound lesson.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A decade ago, author Shelby Steele wrote about a racial preferences debate between the American Civil Rights Institute‘s Ward Connerly and law professor Christopher Edley on C-SPAN. Among other things, Steele lamented over what he called the “disappearance of the black individual.”

During the Q&A portion of the debate, a pro-preferences black Harvard student rose to “challenge” Connerly for opposing lowered standards for blacks. Steele wrote (emphases added):

“Now consider what this Harvard student is called upon by his racial identity to argue in the year 2002. All that is creative and imaginative in him must be rallied to argue the essential weakness of his own people. Only their weakness justifies the racial preferences they receive decades after any trace of anti-black racism in college admissions. The young man must not show faith in the power of his people to overcome against any odds; he must show faith in their inability to overcome without help. As Mr. Connerly points to far less racism and far more freedom and opportunity for blacks, the young man must find a way, against all the mounting facts, to argue that black Americans simply cannot compete without preferences. If his own forebears seized freedom in a long and arduous struggle for civil rights, he must argue that his own generation is unable to compete on paper-and-pencil standardized tests.”

I’m reminded of Steele’s words every time I hear or read about blacks filing lawsuits that claim civil service exams are discriminatory. It’s truly maddening. Instead of being embarrassed by the implication that they can’t be expected to compete against whites on paper-and-pencil tests, they hold their heads high while proclaiming it in public. I don’t get it.

Nicholas GaraufisIn 2007, the Department of Justice under George W. Bush filed suit against the New York City Fire Department (FDNY) for violating the Civil Rights Act, claiming that two pass-fail written exams and the rank ordering process disparately impacted minorities and weren’t job-related or consistent with business necessity. The Vulcan Society, a fraternal organization of black FDNY firefighters, joined the lawsuit.

Last summer, Judge Nicholas Garaufis ruled that FDNY discriminated against blacks and Hispanics with a recruitment exam used between 1999 and 2007. Last week, the same judge ruled that New York City intentionally discriminated against minorities by continuing to use the exam. (Source)

Download the 107-page FDNY exam from 1999. (PDF).

Mayor Michael Bloomberg defended the city’s use of the “discriminating” tests. “When I came into office, it was right after 9/11, so we used the old test because we had to recruit right away. We didn’t have the luxury of revisiting and starting the process of building a new test base.” (Source)

New York City faces millions in damages, which may or may not include the additional cost of hiring consultants to develop a test racial minorities can pass at rates similar to whites. What would such a test look like? No multiple choice or reading comprehension questions? More pictures? Oral only? Or perhaps the city will drop civil service entrance and promotion exams altogether. It might sound the death knell for disparate impact lawsuits.

But not likely.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Sandra Day O’Connor Revises Preferences Opinion

January 19, 2010

In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Grutter v. Bollinger that the University of Michigan law school’s use of race in admissions was narrowly tailored to further a compelling interest in “obtaining the educational benefits that flow from” a skin deep-only diverse student body. Justice Sandra Day O’Conner, who voted with the majority, wrote [...]

Read the full article →

Declining to State Race

January 19, 2010

The last time I filled out an application for a library card, I refused to state my race. I shouldn’t have been surprised to see a box for race on such an application, but I was. No doubt the government believes it has a legitimate reason (for “statistical purposes only” to receive government grants?) to [...]

Read the full article →

Race-Neutral Effect on Minority Representation Modest

January 14, 2010

In “Assessing the Impact of Eliminating Affirmative Action in Higher Education,” Jessica S. Howell of California State University, Sacramento, acknowledges that declines in minority representation at colleges and universities in California and Texas, states that bar the government from discriminating against or preferring individuals or groups based on race in hiring, contracting, and admissions, have [...]

Read the full article →

Racial Role Models in Science

January 14, 2010

“Science and engineering should look like the rest of the population,” said Daryl Chubin of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). And if the racial bean-counting doesn’t yield the desired results, “somebody needs to pull the plug and say this has not been an open and fair search.” The Center for Equal [...]

Read the full article →

New Jersey Sued For Disparate Impact

January 12, 2010

Aside from eliminating civil service tests altogether, what can be done to lessen the adverse impact such tests have on racial minorities? Should there be more emphasis on preparation, tinkering with the test to “ensure” more or less equal outcomes, or rigging the results? Fewer multiple choice questions and more oral testing? My view on [...]

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Read the full article →