<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Civil Rights Institute Blog &#187; Richard Sander</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acri.org/blog/category/richard-sander/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acri.org/blog</link>
	<description>&#34;Race has no place in American Life or Law&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Mismatch&#8217; and Racial Preferences</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/10/26/mismatch-and-racial-preferences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/10/26/mismatch-and-racial-preferences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=9860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed Whelan at National Review writes about Fisher v. Texas, the &#8220;affirmative action&#8221; case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. He cites research reported in two amicus briefs submitted by Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr., and U.S. Commission on Civil Rights members Gail Heriot, Peter Kirsanow, and Todd Gaziano (emphasis in original): &#8220;It is, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/10/26/mismatch-and-racial-preferences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Law Journal Interviews Richard Sander</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/17/national-journal-interviews-richard-sander/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/17/national-journal-interviews-richard-sander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=8942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week I blogged about the recent ruling in law professor Richard Sander&#8217;s case. A three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeal ruled that the public has a right to access state bar data that doesn&#8217;t reveal private information. Previous courts had held that the bar was not legally required to turn [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/17/national-journal-interviews-richard-sander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: Bar Exam Data Are Public Documents</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/14/court-bar-exam-data-are-public-documents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/14/court-bar-exam-data-are-public-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Achievement Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=8860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I told you that a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeal heard arguments in UCLA law professor Richard Sander&#8217;s quest to obtain racial and ethnic data from the California bar exam applicants. According to Law.com, Justice Stuart Pollak said, &#8220;The State Bar is providing a vital function here, which is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/14/court-bar-exam-data-are-public-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Sander Appeals to Judge Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/07/richard-sander-appeals-to-judge-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/07/richard-sander-appeals-to-judge-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Achievement Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=8814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UCLA law professor Richard Sander continues his quest to obtain racial and ethnic data on California bar exam applicants. Last week, a three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeal heard arguments, and Law.com reports that &#8220;two justices… appeared ready to draw opposite conclusions. The third didn&#8217;t tip his hand.&#8221; Sander concluded in a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/06/07/richard-sander-appeals-to-judge-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA Bar: Race Should Affect Law School Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/02/23/ca-bar-race-should-affect-law-school-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/02/23/ca-bar-race-should-affect-law-school-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Achievement Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=7836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Law Journal reports that the State Bar of California believes U.S. News &#38; World Report should take into account a law school&#8217;s percentage of brown faces on campus when compiling its annual list of overall law school rankings. The publication already compiles a separate diversity ranking list. A school&#8217;s quality assessment accounts for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/02/23/ca-bar-race-should-affect-law-school-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Rights Commission Confirms Mismatch Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/01/03/civil-rights-commission-confirms-mismatch-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/01/03/civil-rights-commission-confirms-mismatch-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Achievement Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=7306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gail Heriot, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, penned an op-ed about how &#8220;affirmative action&#8221; actually harms aspiring college students. According to a commission report released last month, affirmative action, or lowered standards for minorities, hurts a students chances of becoming a doctor, scientist, engineer. Sounds intuitive, doesn&#8217;t it? An excerpt of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2011/01/03/civil-rights-commission-confirms-mismatch-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Rules Against Richard Sander</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2010/04/01/court-rules-against-richard-sander/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2010/04/01/court-rules-against-richard-sander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=4860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2004, University of California at Los Angeles law professor Richard Sander released a study called A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools (PDF), in which he contends that law school race-based preferences result in fewer black lawyers, because blacks admitted under these conditions are placed in schools that exceed their levels [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2010/04/01/court-rules-against-richard-sander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study on Preferences Mismatch Theory</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2009/04/22/new-study-on-preferences-mismatch-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2009/04/22/new-study-on-preferences-mismatch-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Clegg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=1518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Sander has documented the mismatch effect that occurs when blacks are admitted to selective schools through race preferences. He found that law students admitted under preferences tended to receive lower grades and pass the bar exam at lower rates. Sander posits that without preferences, blacks would be better matched to their schools. Four Duke [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2009/04/22/new-study-on-preferences-mismatch-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Race Preference Contortionists</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2009/03/26/race-preference-contortionists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2009/03/26/race-preference-contortionists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Clegg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After you read Affirmative-Action Programs for Minority Students: Right in Theory, Wrong in Practice (excepted at TaxProf Blog), you may come away as amazed as I was. Proponents of race preferences contort themselves into strange positions to justify the practice and avoid stating the obvious. The article is adapted from the four authors&#8217; new book, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2009/03/26/race-preference-contortionists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Supreme Court Denies Richard Sander&#8217;s Request</title>
		<link>http://www.acri.org/blog/2008/09/24/california-supreme-court-denies-richard-sanders-request/</link>
		<comments>http://www.acri.org/blog/2008/09/24/california-supreme-court-denies-richard-sanders-request/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbarber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Sander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acri.org/blog/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 2004 study called A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools (PDF), University of California law professor Richard Sander posited that law school race-based preferences result in fewer black lawyers, because blacks admitted under these conditions are placed in schools that exceed their levels of preparation. As a result, they failed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.acri.org/blog/2008/09/24/california-supreme-court-denies-richard-sanders-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

